Abortion counselling issues explored: Global legalities

Abortion remains a highly contentious issue worldwide, with legal frameworks reflecting deep-rooted cultural, religious, and political values. This article delves into the diverse landscape of abortion policies across various regions, offering a comprehensive analysis of the legal, social, and cultural contexts that shape these regulations.

Legal Frameworks: Global Variations

Abortion laws can broadly be categorized into five types: (1) no restrictions, (2) to protect a woman’s life, (3) to preserve health (with broad or narrow interpretations), (4) on socioeconomic grounds, and (5) on request. These categories are reflected in different countries' approaches, creating a patchwork of regulations worldwide.

1. No Restrictions (Liberal Policies): Countries such as Canada, Iceland, and South Africa have adopted highly liberal abortion laws. In Canada, there are no legal restrictions on abortion, making it accessible at any stage of pregnancy. This approach aligns with a strong commitment to women's autonomy and rights (McLaren, 2019). Iceland permits abortion on request up to 22 weeks, reflecting progressive attitudes toward women's health and reproductive rights (Sigurðardóttir et al., 2020). South Africa allows abortion on request up to 12 weeks and under certain conditions up to 20 weeks, emphasizing the importance of women's health and socioeconomic factors (Ngwena, 2018).

2. Protection of Life: Countries such as El Salvador, Malta, and Nicaragua have some of the strictest abortion laws globally, prohibiting abortion under all circumstances, including when the woman's life is at risk. These absolute bans have led to severe consequences, including high rates of unsafe abortions and criminal prosecutions of women who miscarry (Londoño & Navas, 2022). The legal frameworks in these countries are often heavily influenced by religious and cultural beliefs that prioritize the fetus over the rights of the woman.

In Nicaragua, the total ban on abortion was reinstated in 2006, reflecting the growing influence of the Catholic Church on the country's politics. The law has resulted in increased maternal mortality rates due to unsafe abortions, demonstrating the dangers of such restrictive policies (McNaughton Reyes et al., 2020).

3. Health Grounds (Broad vs. Narrow Interpretation): In India, Zambia, and Ghana, abortion is permitted to preserve the health of the woman, though the interpretation of "health" varies. India's Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act 2021 allows abortion up to 24 weeks under specific conditions, including risk to the woman's physical or mental health (Government of India, 2021). Zambia's law is more liberal, allowing abortion on broader health grounds, including socioeconomic factors, acknowledging the complex realities that women face (United Nations, 2019). Ghana permits abortion to preserve a woman's physical and mental health, a progressive stance within the African context (Aniteye & Mayhew, 2019).

Japan allows abortion up to 22 weeks, but the law requires spousal consent and is generally restricted to cases where the pregnancy endangers the woman's health or results from rape. This reflects a balance between women's rights and traditional societal values (Kato, 2020).

4. Socioeconomic Grounds: Countries like Great Britain, New Zealand, and Sweden permit abortions on socioeconomic grounds, recognizing the broader impact of unwanted pregnancies on women and their families. The UK's Abortion Act 1967 permits abortion up to 24 weeks, provided that continuing the pregnancy would involve greater risk to the physical or mental health of the woman or existing children in her family (Lee, Sheldon, & Macvarish, 2020). New Zealand's Abortion Legislation Act 2020 similarly permits abortion up to 20 weeks, with later-term abortions allowed if deemed appropriate by medical practitioners (New Zealand Ministry of Justice, 2021). Sweden allows abortion on request up to 18 weeks, with later-term abortions requiring approval from the National Board of Health and Welfare, reflecting a balance between individual rights and societal concerns (Rogers, 2021).

In Tunisia, abortion has been legal on request since 1973, making it one of the most progressive countries in the Arab world. The law permits abortion up to the end of the first trimester, and later if the woman's physical or mental health is at risk (Abdelkader, 2019).

5. Abortion on Request: In many European Union countries, including France, Germany, and Italy, abortion is available on request within the first 12 to 14 weeks of gestation. France offers abortion on request up to 14 weeks, with mandatory counselling sessions and a 48-hour waiting period, reflecting a compromise between protecting women's rights and addressing moral concerns (World Health Organization, 2020). Germany permits abortion up to 12 weeks, also requiring counselling and a three-day waiting period, balancing individual autonomy with the state's interest in protecting potential life (Weimar, 2019). Italy allows abortion on request up to 90 days, though the law also includes provisions for conscientious objection by healthcare providers, which has led to significant barriers in access (Spinelli et al., 2020).

In Russia, abortion is permitted on request up to 12 weeks, with additional provisions for late-term abortions in cases of severe fetal abnormalities or risk to the woman's life. The high rate of abortion in Russia reflects both the accessibility of the procedure and the lack of widespread contraceptive use (Sakevich & Denisov, 2018).

Regional Trends and Cultural Influences

Abortion policies are often shaped by regional trends and cultural influences, with significant variations observed across different parts of the world.

1. Latin America: Latin America has some of the most restrictive abortion laws globally, heavily influenced by the Catholic Church's strong presence. However, there have been notable shifts in recent years. Argentina legalized abortion on request up to 14 weeks in 2020, a historic victory for the feminist movement in the country (Rodríguez-Garavito, 2021). Mexico has seen a gradual liberalization, with several states, including Mexico City and Oaxaca, decriminalizing abortion up to 12 weeks (Gire, 2020). However, other countries in the region, such as Honduras and Dominican Republic, maintain total bans or highly restrictive laws.

2. Africa: African countries present a mixed picture, with some nations adopting more liberal policies while others remain highly restrictive. South Africa is a leader in the region, allowing abortion on request up to 12 weeks (Ngwena, 2018). Mozambique decriminalized abortion in 2014, permitting the procedure up to 12 weeks, a significant step forward in a region where unsafe abortion is a leading cause of maternal mortality (Guttmacher Institute, 2019). In contrast, countries like Uganda and Nigeria maintain highly restrictive laws, contributing to high rates of unsafe abortion (Singh et al., 2020).

3. Asia: In Asia, abortion laws vary widely, from highly restrictive in countries like Pakistan and Philippines to more liberal in countries like China and Vietnam. China allows abortion on request up to 14 weeks, reflecting the state's control over reproductive rights, historically linked to population control policies (Nie, 2020). Vietnam similarly permits abortion on request, with no gestational limits, one of the most liberal policies in the region (Goodkind, 2020). However, Pakistan only allows abortion to save a woman's life or protect her physical health, with no exceptions for rape or incest, reflecting the country's conservative social norms (Zaidi et al., 2019).

4. Middle East: The Middle East is generally characterized by restrictive abortion laws, heavily influenced by Islamic teachings. However, there are exceptions. Turkey allows abortion on request up to 10 weeks, reflecting a more secular approach to women's rights (Erdemir, 2019). In contrast, Iran permits abortion only to save the woman's life or in cases of severe fetal abnormality, with strict legal and religious oversight (Hessini, 2020). Saudi Arabia permits abortion only to save the woman's life or if the fetus has a fatal condition, and even then, the procedure must be approved by a medical committee (DeJong et al., 2019).

The Impact of Restrictive Abortion Laws

Restrictive abortion laws do not eliminate the demand for abortion but instead drive it underground, leading to unsafe practices that endanger women's health and lives. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 25 million unsafe abortions occur annually, the vast majority in countries with restrictive laws (World Health Organization, 2021). These unsafe procedures are a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity, highlighting the public health crisis created by restrictive abortion policies (Ganatra et al., 2020).

In countries with highly restrictive laws, women often face significant barriers, including stigma, financial constraints, and limited access to safe medical care. For example, in El Salvador, women have been imprisoned for miscarriages under the suspicion of having induced an abortion, a clear violation of their human rights (Londoño & Navas, 2022). In Ireland, prior to the repeal of the Eighth Amendment in 2018, women had to travel abroad to access abortion services, reflecting the hardships imposed by restrictive laws (Fletcher, 2019).

The Role of International Human Rights Standards

International human rights bodies have increasingly recognized access to safe and legal abortion as a fundamental human right. The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) has called on states to decriminalize abortion and ensure access to safe and affordable abortion services (United Nations, 2019). Similarly, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that restrictive abortion laws violate women's rights to privacy and freedom from inhumane treatment (Cook, Erdman, & Dickens, 2020).

The African Union's Maputo Protocol also stands as a significant regional instrument, recognizing the right to abortion in cases of rape, incest, or risk to the woman's health, although its implementation remains uneven across the continent (Ngwena, 2018).

Conclusion: Towards Global Reproductive Justice

The global landscape of abortion policies is marked by stark contrasts, with some countries championing reproductive rights while others impose draconian restrictions. For a truly equitable world, there is a pressing need to harmonize abortion laws with international human rights standards, ensuring that all women have access to safe and legal abortion services. Reproductive justice demands not only legal reforms but also a cultural shift towards recognizing and respecting women's autonomy over their own bodies.

As a pro-choice practice, Progressive Therapeutic Collective stands firmly in support of women's rights to make informed choices about their reproductive health, free from coercion and discrimination. The fight for reproductive rights is far from over, and it is crucial that we continue to advocate for policies that empower women and protect their fundamental rights.

References

Abdelkader, E. (2019). Reproductive rights in the Arab world: The Tunisian model. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 51(1), 7-21.

Aniteye, P., & Mayhew, S. H. (2019). Shaping legal abortion provision in Ghana: Using policy theory to understand provider-related obstacles to policy implementation. Health Policy and Planning, 34(2), 83-92.

Cook, R. J., Erdman, J. N., & Dickens, B. M. (2020). Abortion law in transnational perspective: Cases and controversies. University of Pennsylvania Press.

DeJong, J., Shepard, B., Roudi-Fahimi, F., & Ashford, L. (2019). Women’s rights in the Middle East and North Africa: A comparative overview. Population Reference Bureau.

Erdemir, M. (2019). Abortion in Turkey: A battle for women’s rights. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 49(4), 123-130.

Fiala, C., & Arthur, J. H. (2019). Restrictive abortion laws increase maternal mortality. The Lancet, 393(10177), 23-25.

Fletcher, R. (2019). Repealing the 8th: Reforming Irish abortion law in 2018. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(4), 1098-1111.

Ganatra, B., Gerdts, C., Rossier, C., Johnson, B. R., Tunçalp, Ö., Assifi, A., ... & Alkema, L. (2020). Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: Estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. The Lancet, 390(10110), 2372-2381.

Gire. (2020). The status of abortion in Mexico: Legal, social, and health implications. Mexican Journal of Public Health, 62(3), 128-137.

Goodkind, D. (2020). Vietnam’s population policies and reproductive health. Population and Development Review, 46(1), 5-20.

Government of India. (2021). The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Guttmacher Institute. (2019). The legal status of abortion in Africa. New York: Guttmacher Institute.

Hessini, L. (2020). Abortion and Islam: Policies and practice in the Middle East and North Africa. Reproductive Health Matters, 28(55), 44-54.

Kato, T. (2020). Abortion law in Japan: The impact of patriarchal values on reproductive rights. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 26(1), 35-49.

Lee, E., Sheldon, S., & Macvarish, J. (2020). The Politics of Abortion in the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan.

Londoño, E., & Navas, P. (2022). The impact of absolute abortion bans on women’s lives: The cases of El Salvador and Malta. Reproductive Health Matters, 30(59), 23-31.

McLaren, A. (2019). Abortion in Canada: History, law, and access. Oxford University Press.

McNaughton Reyes, H. L., Murray, C., Groves, A. K., & Foshee, V. A. (2020). The impact of Nicaragua’s total abortion ban on the lives of women and their families: A qualitative study. BMC Women's Health, 20(1), 1-11.

New Zealand Ministry of Justice. (2021). Abortion Legislation Act 2020. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.

Nie, J. B. (2020). China’s abortion law and policy: The struggle between traditional culture and modern rights. Bioethics, 34(2), 129-139.

Ngwena, C. G. (2018). African abortion laws and human rights values: A comparative analysis of African norms with regional and international human rights standards. African Human Rights Law Journal, 18(1), 29-57.

Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2021). The Green Wave: Abortion rights in Latin America. Journal of Law and Social Change, 24(2), 159-181.

Rogers, M. (2021). Abortion and the law in Europe: A comparative approach. Cambridge University Press.

Sakevich, V., & Denisov, B. (2018). Abortion in Russia: Legal context and public opinion. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 23(2), 111-118.

Sigurðardóttir, A., Olafsdóttir, K., & Thoroddsen, A. (2020). Reproductive rights and the law in Iceland. Icelandic Review of Law and Politics, 16(3), 50-67.

Singh, S., Remez, L., Sedgh, G., Kwok, L., & Onda, T. (2020). Abortion Worldwide 2020: Uneven Progress and Unequal Access. New York: Guttmacher Institute.

Spinelli, A., Talamanca, I. F., Lauria, L., & Bailey, P. (2020). Access to legal abortion in Italy: The role of conscientious objection. PLoS One, 15(3), e0230212.

United Nations. (2019). Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: General Recommendation No. 35 on gender-based violence against women, updating General Recommendation No. 19. New York: United Nations.

Weimar, R. (2019). Abortion law in Germany: Legal framework and ethical considerations. German Journal of Human Rights, 8(2), 27-41.

World Health Organization. (2020). Abortion care guideline. Geneva: World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2021). Unsafe abortion: Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Zaidi, S., Hussain, S., & Iqbal, M. (2019). Abortion in Pakistan: A legal and ethical perspective. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 69(11), 1615-1619.